Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 07:28

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Global Investors Suddenly Have a New Concern: A U.S. ‘Revenge Tax’ - WSJ
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Why are people saying that Taylor Swift is the smartest person on Earth?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
CNN interrupted for devastating Elon Musk news amid Donald Trump showdown - Irish Star
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Thank you.
European leaders worry they’re too reliant on U.S. tech - TechCrunch
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What’s next?
Russia can stop this any time.
Derek Jeter Shares Brutal Reality for Yankees After Dodgers Loss - Sports Illustrated
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Is it true that Jehovah's witnesses once thought the world would end in 1975?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Rikishi calls for WWE writers to be fired for botching Jey Uso’s world title run - Cageside Seats
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.